SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ori) 18

D.M.PATNAIK
BIJAYA KUMAR SUBUDHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.DHAL, S.DAS

D. M. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT having been convicted under section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as N. D. P. S. Act) and sentenced to R. I. for ten years and fine of rupees one lakh, assails his conviction.

( 2 ) PROSECUTION case is, on 24. 10. 1989 about 5 p. m. , P. W. 5 then S. I. of Excise with his other staff was on mobile duty in Pun Lown for detection of offences under the N. D. P. S. Act. On receiving reliable information that the appellant was illegally trafficking in narcotic substances, P. W. 5 and others reached near the house of the appellant in Daitapara Sahi and found the appellant on the road in front of his house. He was detained and on his personal search there was recovery 0. 050 milligrams of narcotic substance kept in two paper packets, each weighing 0. 025 milligrams. It is the case or the prosecution that before the search the appellant was asked of his option for being searched in presence of a Gazetted of ricer and oil his agreeing, he was searched in presence of P. W. 4, a member or the raiding party. On recovery of this quantity of brown sugar the same was scaled in presence of the appellant.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top