ARIJIT PASAYAT, PRADIPTA RAY
KALI NAYAK ALIAS MUKHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of a common judgement passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar. The three appellants in these two appeals (hereinafter referred to as 'accused' by their respective names) faced trial for allegedly having committed an offence u/s. 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'i. P. C. '), by intentionally causing death of Surendra Nayak (hereinafter referred to as 'deceased') in furtherance of their common intention.
( 2 ) SANS unnecessary details, the prosecution case as unfolded during trial is as follows :the deceased was serving as a Sweeper in the S. C. B. Medical College, Cuttack and was residing at Kedaipali of Bhubaneswar in the house of his mother-in-law, Labanya Bewa (P. W. 7), along with his wife Rama Dei (P. W. l ). He used to come daily from Bhubaneswar to attend his work at Cuttack. On 4-5-1989, he left his house to catch the morning train for coming to Cuttack. He had to carry some clothes of his wife (P. W. 1) to get them stitched at Cuttack. Since the deceased left the home without carrying the clothes, P. W. 1 carried them and ran after him to hand-over and near the shop of one Prakash, s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.