ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.C.NAIK
ASIT KUMAR NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
A. PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) PETITIONER challenges legality of the action taken by the Tahasildar, G. Udayagiri (opposite party No. 2) in cancelling the caste certificate issued to the petitioner under the Orissa Caste Certificate (for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe) Rules, 1980 (in short 'rules') in R. M. C. No. 1234 of 1989 dated 19-10-1989. From the impugned order dated 26-9-94 we find that on the basis of certain allegations received, stating that the actual caste of the petitioner, was not Gond an inquiry was conducted by the Tahasildar and relying on certain social relationships as revealed from the statements of certain persons, caste of the petitioner was taken to be 'guna' which is a general caste and not 'gond' which is relatable to Scheduled Tribe. According to Mr. P. Palit, learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity to present his case before cancellation of the certificate.
( 2 ) PURSUANT to the direction given by this Court, the records of R. M. C. No. 1234 of 1989 were produced. We find from the record that certain statements have been recorded and in fact, statement of Sridhar Nayak, father of the petitioner was one of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.