SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ori) 181

R.K.PATRA
PRAFULLA KUMAR PANDA – Appellant
Versus
AMARI KUMARI PANDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.SAHOO, K.C.SAHOO, S.K.MOHANTY

R. K. PATRA, J.


( 1 ) SHOULD a contentious issue as to the meaning and purport of the expression "a change in the circumstances" appearing in Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'the Code') be decided in this revision filed by the husband against his wife ? The petitioner who is the husband of the opposite party contends that the validity of the impugned order depends upon the meaning of the above expression and adjudication on the point is called for.

( 2 ) THESE are the facts of the case Opposite party filed a petition under Section 126 of the Code against the petitioner on 23-6-1986 in the court of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhenkanal which was registered as Criminal Misc. Case No. 53 of 1986. On the prayer made by her, the learned Magistrate passed an interim order on 24-6-1986 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 200/- as monthly allowance towards her maintenance. After receipt of notice in the case, the petitioner appeared and filed his written statement. He however, instead of immediately contesting the matter filed Criminal Revision No. 86 of 1986 in the court of the Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal challenging the aforesaid interim order









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top