SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 70

P.K.MISRA
ADA ALIAS ADEITA BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DAS, PRASANNA MISHRA

P. K. MISRA, J.


( 1 ) AN allegedly libertine person is claiming liberty on the ground of alleged violation of provisions of Section 167 (2) Proviso, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the "code" ). The petitioner has been arrayed as one of the accused persons in G. R. Case No. 507 of 1995 in the file of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhenkanal, on the allegation that he along with two others forcibly violated a helpless and helpless and insane lady. The petitioner surrendered before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate on 11-12-1995 who passed orders of remand from time to time pending submission of charge-sheet. On 27-2-1996, the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate directed remand of the petitioner till 11-3-1996. On 10-3-1996, the petitioner filed an application before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate for grant of bail on the ground that charge sheet having not been filed within ninety days, he is entitled to be released on bail, as on envisaged under Section 167 (2), Proviso, of the Code. It was contend that maximum period of remand of ninety days was completion 8-3-1996 and as such bail should be granted as charge sheet had not b









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top