SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 187

D.MISRA, P.C.NAIK
A. KRISHNA PATRA – Appellant
Versus
ORISSA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M.PATNAIK, G.A.RAO, P.K.ROY CHAUDHARY, S.K.BAHERA, S.K.PUROHIT

P. C. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition, the petitioner claims compensation of Rupees 1,00,000/- from the Orissa State Electricity Board (hereinafter called 'the O. S. E. B. ') and its functionaries for the death of his wife who was electrocuted when she came in contact with a live conductor which had snapped and was lying on the ground.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the mishap was solely due to the negligence of the opposite parties who had failed to maintain the line in proper order, in utter disregard to the statutory safeguards. The opposite parties, i. e. the O. S. E. B. and its functionaries, have filed a counter denying its liability.

( 3 ) THE fact that the petitioner's wife was electrocuted when she came in contact with a live conductor which had snapped and was lying on the ground, is not disputed. However, the allegation of negligence and poor supervision is denied. The stand taken by the opposite parties in reflected in paragraph 7 of their counter which reads thus :". . . . THERE might be the death if the lady due to the electric shock but these opposite parties are no way responsible for the death of the wife of the petitioner, since these opposite parties are n


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top