ARIJIT PASAYAT
SANJUKTA RAY – Appellant
Versus
BIMELENDU MOHANTY – Respondent
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) HE who says what is mine is yours and what is yous is yours is a saint. He says, what is your is mine and what is mine is mine is a wicked man", says Babylanian Telmud (Aboth V ). The principal characters involved in this unfortunate family dispute are brother and sister, giving a lie to the saying blood in thicker than water. Bone of controversy revolves round a building standing on AC 0. 64 decimals of land claimed to have been gifted by Sita Devi, mother of Bimelendu (plaintiff No. 1), Sanjukta and Sakuntala (defendant Nos. 1 and 2) and mother-in-law of Niharika (plaintiff No. 2) who are respondent No. 1, appellant, respondent No. 3 and respondent No. 2 respectively in this appeal.
( 2 ) A brief reference to the factual position would suffice. Suit property described in Schedule B of the plaint originally belonged to one Ganesh Chandra who executed a registered permanent lease deed dated 11-4-1944 in favour of aforesaid Sita Devi in respect of the same, along with other properties forming a compact book measuring Ac. O. 238 decimals. At the time of execution of the said lease deed, no building was standing on any part of the property. On 24l2-1962 she e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.