SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 168

ARIJIT PASAYAT
SANJUKTA RAY – Appellant
Versus
BIMELENDU MOHANTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, Lokesh Roy, S.K.DAS GUPTA, S.K.MISHRA, S.N.MOHAPATRA, S.P.MOHANTY

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.


( 1 ) HE who says what is mine is yours and what is yous is yours is a saint. He says, what is your is mine and what is mine is mine is a wicked man", says Babylanian Telmud (Aboth V ). The principal characters involved in this unfortunate family dispute are brother and sister, giving a lie to the saying blood in thicker than water. Bone of controversy revolves round a building standing on AC 0. 64 decimals of land claimed to have been gifted by Sita Devi, mother of Bimelendu (plaintiff No. 1), Sanjukta and Sakuntala (defendant Nos. 1 and 2) and mother-in-law of Niharika (plaintiff No. 2) who are respondent No. 1, appellant, respondent No. 3 and respondent No. 2 respectively in this appeal.

( 2 ) A brief reference to the factual position would suffice. Suit property described in Schedule B of the plaint originally belonged to one Ganesh Chandra who executed a registered permanent lease deed dated 11-4-1944 in favour of aforesaid Sita Devi in respect of the same, along with other properties forming a compact book measuring Ac. O. 238 decimals. At the time of execution of the said lease deed, no building was standing on any part of the property. On 24l2-1962 she e






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top