SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 148

DIPAK MISRA
KANDURI SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Panda, D.PANDA, G.BHAL, N.Prusty, S.K.LENKA, S.MOHAPATRA

DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant stands convicted under section 20 (b) (i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 1985 (in short the Act) and sentenced to undergo RI, for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of such payment, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the prosecution case is that at about 7 a. m. on 13-5-1994, the Excise Subinspector, Mobile Squad No. 1. Cuttack, (PW- 1) while patrolling with his A. S. I. and Constable at Gandhipalli area in Cuttack City noticed the accused coming with a full gunny-bag. Being suspicious he retained the accused and searched him in presence of panch witness (PW- 2 ). He found that the gunny bag contained cannabis (ganja) which weighed 12 Kgs. He took sample of 50 grams which was sent for chemical examination. The chemical examination indicated that it was cannabis (ganja ). After completion of the investigation, the appellant was sent for trial to face charges which has ended in conviction and sentence has been passed as mentioned above. The appellant denied the charges in totality.

( 3 ) IN order to bring home the charges, the prosecution examined three witnes







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top