SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ori) 61

P.K.MISRA
JADUMANI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.JENA, B.K.SAHOO, G.R.SAHU, P.K.SAHU

P. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant has been convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the N. D. P. S. Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for five years.

( 2 ) AS per the prosecution case on 9-8-1991 while P. W. 5 the Sub-Inspector of Excise was patrolling along with other officials in village Iswarpur, he received information that accused Jadumani Sahu was in possession of huge quantity of opium. Immediately, thereafter, the excise staff searched the house of the accused and from the second bed room under the cot opium was seized. After weighing, samples were drawn and on completion of investigation prosecution report was submitted.

( 3 ) THE plea of the accused was one of denial and it was stated that the house from which the contraband articles were seized belonged to Kulamani Sahu, an agnatic relation of the accused and not to the accused.

( 4 ) DURING the trial, six witnesses were examined on behalf of the prosecution, of whom P. Ws. 3 and 5 are respectively the Asstt. Sub-Inspector of Exc



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top