SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ori) 97

P.K.TRIPATHY
URMILA SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


P. K. TRIPATHY, J.


( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief involved in this case are that G. R. Case No. 214 of 1989 corresponding to O. 258/97. Digapahandi P. S. Case No. 77 of 1989 was registered against the petitioner and the co-accused for the offences under Sections 498-A/34, I. P. C. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Charge-sheet was filed on 30-6-1991 showing the petitioner as an absconder. it is not disputed at the Bar that the attendance of the petitioner could not be secured. Thus, the G. R. Case was spilitted and G. R. Case No. 214/a of 1989 against the petitioner was sent to the dormant file. So far as the co-accused is concerned, the trial of G. R. Case No. 214/89 is presently pending at the stage of hearing argument.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was not aware of the pendency of the case and she was wrongly shown as an absconder. He further states that in G. R. Case No. 214/89 since last about one year argument has not been heard because of non-posting of a Magistrate. He argues that from the evidence available in G. R. Case No.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top