SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 38

P.K.MISRA
CHAGALA KUMAR PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
UJJAL SENAPATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.RATH, M.K.PANDA, O.K.MISHRA, R.MISHRA, R.N.MOHANTY

P. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants in a pending suit have filed this revision against the order of the trial court refusing to stay the further, proceedings of the suit.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing of the present civil revision are as follows : the opposite parties 1 to 4 have filed m. S. No. 59 of 1996 in the court of Civil judge (Sr. Divn.), Dhenkanal, claiming Rs. 8,46,000/- as compensation on the ground that the defendants had killed the son of opposite party No. 1. The present petitioners who are the accused persons in G. R. Case no. 66 of 1995 and facing trial under Section 302/34, IPC, after appearance in the said suit filed an application for staying the further proceeding of the suit on the ground that the suit should be stayed till disposal of the criminal case. The said application having been dismissed by the trial court by placing reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court, reported in State of Rajasthan v. M/s, Kalyan sundaram Cement Industries Ltd. and Ors. the present civil revision has been filed.

( 3 ) IT has been contended by the counsel for the petitioners that since the petitioners are facing a serious charge in a criminal case, they wou


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top