SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 129

High Court Of Orissa
P. K. TRIPATHY
PRASANT KUMAR SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA - Respondent
CRI. MISC.   274  Of  1998
Decided On : 06/19/1998

Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, R.K.PATNAIK, S.DAS GUPTA, S.K.MISHRA, SUSHANT KUMAR DAS

The importance of providing a reasoned order and considering the grounds advanced in support of a petition under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Headnote:

205 - Criminal Procedure - The court set aside the summarily rejected application under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and remanded the matter to the lower court to hear afresh and dispose of the same in accordance with law, delivering a speaking order within a specified period.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, one of the accused persons in a criminal case, filed a petition under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which was summarily rejected without assigning any reason.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the lower court to hear afresh the petitioner's petition under section 205, and to dispose of the same in accordance with law, delivering a speaking order within a specified period.

Issues: Summarily rejected application under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arbitrary non-speaking order, grounds not considered.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the summarily rejected application without assigning any reason was neither proper nor desirable, and therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing and a reasoned order.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the lower court to hear afresh the petitioner's petition under section 205, and to dispose of the same in accordance with law, delivering a speaking order within a specified period.

P. K. TRIPATHY, J.


( 1 )

( 2 ) IT is agreed upon by both the parties that this matter may be disposed of at this stage of hearing on admission.

( 3 ) PETITIONER is one of the accused persons in G. R. Case No. 2 of 1997 of the Court of S. D. J. M. , Banki. He prayed for representation u/s. 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code' ). That petition was rejected on 6-1-98 and the following order was passed,"the record is put up today on the strength of advance petiton. Advocate for R. N. Prusty files power on behalf of the accused/absconder Sri Prasanta Ku. Singh and files a petition u/s. 205, Cr. P. C. praying dispense with the personal appearance of the accused before this Court on the ground stated therein. Copy served on the A. P. P. The petition u/s. 205, Cr. P. C. hence rejected. "

( 4 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner states that grounds advanced in support of the prayer was not at all considered and the petition was rejected u/s. 205, Cr. P. C. arbitrarily by a non-speaking order. His prayer is that learned Magistrate, should consider the grounds advanced and pass a reasoned order. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel has no objection to that submission.

( 5 ) FROM the abovequoted order it is apparent on the face of it that the application was summarily rejected without assigning any reason. Such an attitude is neither proper nor desirable. Hence the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned S. D. J. M. , Banki to hear afresh the petitioner u/s. 205, Cr. P. C. and to dispose of the same in accordance with law and delivering a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

( 6 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to produce a certified/authenticated copy of this order before the S. D. J. M. by 6-7-1998. In that event learned S. D. J. M. shall fix a date for hearing of the petition u/s. 205, Cr. P. C. and dispose of the same within a period of 15 days thereafter. Free copy of this order be supplied to learned Addl. Standing Counsel so as to issue appropriate instruction to the State Counsel appearing in that Court. Order accordingly.

.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top