SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 216

P.K.MOHANTY
REV. JOSEPH CHERIAN – Appellant
Versus
CELINE THOMAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MUKHERJI, B.ROY, KHETRA MOHAN MISHRA, SANJIB CHAKRAVORTY

P. K. MOHANTY, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants in a suit for injunction and account are the petitioners against the order of injunction passed by the trial Court restraining them from taking any coersive action and subsequently directing reconnection of electric and water supply to the suit scheduled properties.

( 2 ) THE opposite party, as plaintiff filed a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Cuttack for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants-petitioners from existing her from the quarters she occupied as a teacher and subsequently as a principal of the Stewart School, Cuttack, without due process of law till her entitlements and retirement dues have been cleared and for accounts with regard to her entitlements claiming that during a period of 41/2 years intermittently when she remained in charge of principal, she has not been paid a scale admissible to a principal and as per terms of her appointment, she is entitled to retain the quarter till all her dues are cleared. The defendants-petitioners on the other hand refute all the allegations and claims and according to them, all her dues have already been settled inasmuch as there is no contact or understandin









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top