SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ori) 20

P.K.MISRA
JOGINATH GOCHHI – Appellant
Versus
SUDHAKAR PATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, C.S.DAS, N.C.MISHRA, N.MISHRA, R.N.DAS MOHAPATRA, S.C.MISHRA, S.K.DAS GUPTA, S.K.MISHRA

P. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE present opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 filed application under S. 372 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of Succession Certificate after the death of deceased Nabaghana Khatun. The opposite parties 1 and 2 claim that, being the son of the predeceased sister of the deceased Nabaghana, they are the legal heirs and entitled to withdraw the Bank deposits indicated in their petition. Objection was filed by the present petitioners. It was claimed by them that the present petitioner No. 1 was the adopted son of Nabaghana. The matter was disposed of by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) by refusing to issue Succession Certificate and by directing the parties to file appropriate suit for establishing their right, if any. The present opposite parties 1 and 2 filed Misc. Appealno. 143 of 1994, which has been allowed by the Addl. District Judge, Cuttack, who has directed that the Succession Certificate should be granted in favour of the present opposite parties 1 and 2 subject to execution of security to the tune of Rs. 60,000/ -. The said order is under challenge in this Revision.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, vehemently contended that the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top