S.N.PHUKAN, P.K.TRIPATHY
JOGENDRA NAHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
P. K. TRIPATHY, J.
( 1 ) ABOVE noted two writ applications under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Criminal Misc. Case under S. 439 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short 'the Code') were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) O. J. C. No. 17838 of 1997 has been filed by the four petitioners stating that on 12-8-1997 one Balaram Mohanty and his son Hrusikesh Mohanty were brutally assaulted. Balaram Mohanty succumbed to the injuries and it became a sensational political murder case of the locality. On the basis of the F. I. R. (Annexure-1) Purusottampur P. S. Case No. 100 (4) of 1997 was registered. It is stated in the writ petition that during the course of investigation several material witnesses including the petitioners were examined by the Investigating Officer, but being politically motivated and influenced, the Investigating Officer omitted to keep in record i. e. in the case diary, statements of such material witnesses. Thus, petitioners prayed for issue of a direction to the Superintendent of Police (O. P. No. 3) and the officer-in-charge-cum-Investigating Officer (O. P. No. 4) to record the statement of such material witnesses u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.