High Court Of Orissa
P. K. MISRA
ABDUL NAIM - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA - Respondent
CRI. MISC. 3951 Of 1998
Decided On : 07/05/1999
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - SECTION 110 - ARREST AND DETENTION - POLICE POWER TO ARREST - MAGISTRATE'S POWER TO DETAIN - INTERPRETATION OF SECTIONS 110, 111, 112, 113, 115 AND 116 - COURT HELD THAT POLICE HAD NO POWER TO ARREST PETITIONER AND MAGISTRATE HAD NO POWER TO DETAIN HIM.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner was arrested by the police and produced before the Magistrate in a proceeding under Section 110, Cr.P.C. without a warrant being issued. The Magistrate ordered the petitioner to execute a bond for good behavior and remanded him to jail custody for non-execution of the bond.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the police had no power to arrest the petitioner and the Magistrate had no power to detain him. The Court observed that the Magistrate had proceeded to take stringent action against the petitioner without examining the limits of his jurisdiction under Chapter-VIII of the Cr.P.C.
Issues: 1. Whether the police had the power to arrest the petitioner without a warrant under Section 110, Cr.P.C.? 2. Whether the Magistrate had the power to detain the petitioner in jail custody for non-execution of the bond?
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Sections 110, 111, 112, 113, 115 and 116 of the Cr.P.C. and held that: 1. Under Section 110, the Magistrate is required to issue notice to the delinquent to show cause before taking any action. 2. Section 113 provides that summons or warrant may be issued to the person not present in Court. If a person is already in custody, the Magistrate is required to issue a production warrant directing the officer to bring the delinquent to the Court. 3. The Proviso to Section 113 indicates that the Magistrate may issue a warrant for arrest of the delinquent only if he has reason to fear the commission of a breach of the peace and it appears to him that such breach of the peace cannot be prevented otherwise than by the immediate arrest of such person.
Final Decision: The Court directed that the proceeding, if not already completed, should be completed within a reasonable period. The Court also directed that the bail furnished by the petitioner stands discharged.
P. K. MISRA, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the "cr. P. C. ") to release the delinquent who is being proceeded against in a proceeding under Section 110, Cr. P. C. , now pending in the Court of the Executive Magistrate, Cuttack, in Criminal Misc. Case No. 709/98.
( 2 ) IN the present order I shall only deal with the action of the police and the magistrate in arresting the petitioner and keeping him under detention until such petitioner was released on bail under orders of this Court.
( 3 ) IT appears that the proceeding under Section 110, Cr. P. C. was initiated on the basis of Non-F. I. R. No. 76/98 submitted by the Officer-in-Charge of Cantonment Police Station. It appears that the petitioner was arrested by the I. I. C. , Cantonment P. S. and produced along with the Non-F. I. R. No. 76/98 on 17-8-1998 before the Executive Magistrate, Cuttack, who passed the following order :-"17-8-98. Delinquent Sk. Janu alias Abdul Naim, S/o Abdul Alim of Pension Lane, P. S. Cantonment, Dist-Cuttack produced from Police custody being arrested by I. I. C. Cantonment P. S. Non-F. I. R. No. 76/98 u/s. 110, Cr. P. C. He complains no ill-treatment by the Police. The substance of the P. R. are read over and explained to the delinquent and he is called upon to show cause why he should not execute a bond of Rs. 15,000/- with two local satisfactory sureties for the like amount to be of good behaviour for a period of six months. But the allegation is derived,. Delinquent neither prays to release him good behaviour no interim bond. Hence he is remanded to jail custody till 1-9-98. Later - Advocate J. Pal and others appear for the delinquent. Put up on date fixed. "
( 4 ) THE question arises whether the police had the power to arrest the petitioner while initiating the proceeding under Section 110, Cr. P. C. and further as to whether the Executive Magistrate had the power to detain the petitioner in jail custody. For the aforesaid purpose, it is necessary to notice the relevant provisions of the Cr. P. C.
( 5 ) CHAPTER-VIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure contains several provisions relating to security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour. Section 106 relates to security for keeping the peace on conviction. Section 107 relates to security for keeping the peace in other cases, namely, where the Magistrate receives information that any person is likely to commit breach of the peace, or disturb the public tranquillity, or do any wrongful act which may occasion a breach of the peace and disturb the public tranquillity. Section 108 relates to security for good behaviour from persons disseminating seditious matters and Section 109 relates to security for good behaviour from suspected persons. Admittedly, Sections 106 to 109 are not applicable. As a matter of fact, the police and the Magistrate have purported to proceed under Section 110. As per the provision of Section 110, Cr. P. C. , if the Executive magistrate receives information that there is a person within his jurisdiction who comes within the purview of the various clauses, namely clauses (a) to (g) indicated in Section 110, "the Magistrate may, in the manner hereinafter provided, require such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond, with sureties, for his good behaviour for such period, not exceeding three years, as the Magistrate thinks fit". In other words, before taking any action under Section 110, the Magistrate is required to issue notice to the delinquent to show cause. Section 111 which is applicable to provisions under Sections 107, 108, 109 and 110, Cr. P. C. lays down that the Magistrate acting under any of the above sections, shall make an order in writing setting-forth the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed, the term for which it is to be in force and the number, character and class of sureties, if any, required. Section 112 lays down the p
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.