SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ori) 133

High Court Of Orissa
ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. K. MISRA, B. P. DAS
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
DINANATH AGRAWALLA - Respondent
A. H. O.  131  Of  1993
Decided On : 09/17/1999

Advocates Appeared:
A.K.CHOUDHARY, A.K.Mishra, A.R.DAS, B.K.MISHRA, B.Routray, K.B.KAR, M.Sinha, P.P.MISHRA, P.ROY, S.LATIFF, S.N.KARNIK, S.P.Misra, S.RAY

The liability under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, can be saddled on the insurer even in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability is not covered by the policy of insurance.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - SECTION 92-A - SECTION 110-CC - INTEREST ON COMPENSATION - LIABILITY OF INSURER - LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 92-A CAN BE SADDLED ON THE INSURER EVEN IN A CASE WHERE THAT LIABILITY OTHER THAN A STATUTORY LIABILITY IS NOT COVERED BY THE POLICY OF INSURANCE.

Fact of the Case:

A claim for compensation was filed before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, for the death of a person in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded compensation under Section 92-A of the Act, but did not award interest on the compensation. The insurer appealed against the award, contending that it was not liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A as the liability was not covered by the policy of insurance.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Tribunal had the power to award interest on the compensation awarded under Section 92-A of the Act, as the amendment to Section 110-CC of the Act by the Amending Act 47 of 1982 had changed the expression 'claim' for compensation under the Chapter to 'claim' for compensation under the Act. The Court also held that the liability under Section 92-A could be saddled on the insurer even in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability was not covered by the policy of insurance.

Issues: 1. Whether the Tribunal has power to allow interest on the compensation awarded under Section 92-A of the Act in view of amendment to Section 110 CC of the Amending Act 47 of 1982? 2. Whether the liability under Section 92-A can be saddled on the insurer even in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability is not covered by the policy of insurance?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and held that the liability under the section was absolute and not dependent on a claim application being filed by the claimant. The Court also interpreted Section 110-CC of the Act and held that the amendment to the section had changed the expression 'claim' for compensation under the Chapter to 'claim' for compensation under the Act, which meant that interest could be awarded on the compensation awarded under Section 92-A.

Final Decision: The Court answered the reference questions in the affirmative, holding that the Tribunal had the power to award interest on the compensation awarded under Section 92-A of the Act, and that the liability under Section 92-A could be saddled on the insurer even in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability was not covered by the policy of insurance.

A. PASAYAT, A. C. J.

( 1 ) AS there was divergence in view, the matter has been referred to larger Bench and following questions have been referred for opinion:- (a) Whether the Tribunal has power to allow interest on the compensation awarded under Section 92-A of the Act in view of amendment to Section 110 CC of the Amending Act 47 of 1982? and (b) Whether the liability under Section 92-A can be saddled on the insurer even in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability is not covered by the policy of insurance?

( 2 ) THE matter was under consideration in an appeal under Letters Patent arising out of an appeal against order of a learned single Judge dealing with scope and ambit of Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (in short, the 'act' ). Factual aspects need to be noted in brief. Facts as noticed by the learned single Judge and the Division Bench are as follows:-On 16-9-1983, jeep bearing registration number OSS 6481 was proceeding from Bargarh to Paikmal. After crossing Padampur, at about 9 a. m. the vehicle dashed against a bridge as a result of which, it fell into a Nala underneath. Deceased Jagdish Prasad and witnesses (PWs. 5 and 11) were occupants of the vehicle at that time. Fatal injuries sustained by Jadgish Prasad in the accident is cause of action for his legal representatives to file an application before the Second Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Northern Division), Sambalpur (in short, 'tribunal') under Section 110-A of the Act claiming Rs. 3,42,000/- as compensation against Ghanashyam Das (PW-6) as owner and New India Assurance Company Ltd. (the present appellant) as the insurery. Case of Ghanshyam is that while the vehicle was in custody of PW-9 in the garage for repair being entrusted by him, deceased forcibly took away the vehicle for the garage. Since it was taken against his consent by committing an offence, he is not liable for the claim. Case of insurer is that Ghanashyam had agreement with the deceased for transer of the vehicle and thus, deceased was the owner. Since ownership was transferred, it is not liable to indemnify Ghanashyam any further.

( 3 ) ON the facts one of the Hon'ble Judges held as follows:- (a) That even without an application in that regard, the Tribunal could grant compensation under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 on the basis of the no-fault liability; (b) That the Tribunal could not award interest on compensation awarded under Section 92-A. (c) That even when the owner was not liable to pay compensation under Section 110-A of the Act on the principle of vicarious liability, the insurer could be made liable to pay compensation in terms of Section 92-A of the Act. Though the other Hon'ble Judge agreed to the first conclusion, with regard to the second and third conclusions, he held that in view of Section 110-CC. interest could be awarded, and the liability under Section 92-A can be attracted only when that particular liability is covered by the insurance policy, except under statutory liability covered under Section 95 of the Act, liability under Section 92-A can be saddled on the insurer only when that particular liability even in a case where that liability is other than a statutory liability, is covered by it and liability is covered by a policy.

( 4 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Though large number of decisions have been referred to by them, we do not think it necessary to refer to all of them, as we propose to deal with the matter with reference to the relevant provisions and their scope and ambit.

( 5 ) BY virtue of Amendment Act 47 of 1982, a new Chapter, i. e. Chapter VII-A titled 'liability without fault in certain cases' was added with effect from 1-10-1982. The said Chapter consists of Sections 92-A to 92-E of the Act, which correspond to sections 140 to 144 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'new Act' ). Section 92-A provides for award of interim compensation by the owners






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top