High Court Of Orissa
ARIJIT PASAYAT, B. P. DAS
BIJAYANANDA PATRA - Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CUTTACK - Respondent
O. J. C. 7608 Of 1997
Decided On : 09/17/1999
NOISE POLLUTION - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981 - ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986 - PUBLIC NUISANCE - ARTICLE 21 - ARTICLE 25 - ARTICLE 19(1)(A) - NOISE POLLUTION AS A POLLUTANT - NOISE POLLUTION AND ITS EFFECTS ON HEALTH - MEASURES TO CONTROL NOISE POLLUTION - ROLE OF GOVERNMENT AND AUTHORITIES.
Fact of the Case:
Public interest litigation petitions were filed highlighting the issue of noise pollution caused by high sounding explosive fireworks and other blaring sound-producing devices in various parts of the State of Orissa. The petitions sought directions to the concerned authorities to prevent sound pollution and consequential health hazards.
Finding of the Court:
1. Noise pollution is a pollutant that contaminates the environment, causes nuisance, and affects a person's health, thereby offending Article 21 of the Constitution if it exceeds a reasonable limit. 2. Noise pollution can be curbed by adopting measures such as using eco-friendly technology, designing machinery to create less sound, planting trees, creating public awareness, and regulating noise through legislation. 3. The prescribed standards regarding noise by the Government of India should be strictly enforced, and separate courts for noise pollution cases should be established. 4. The subject of environmental protection should be made compulsory at school, college, and university levels, and the press and media should play a constructive role in highlighting the disastrous effects of noise pollution.
Issues: 1. Whether noise pollution is a pollutant that affects a person's health and offends Article 21 of the Constitution? 2. What measures can be taken to control noise pollution? 3. What role should the government and authorities play in preventing noise pollution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Noise pollution is a pollutant that contaminates the environment, causes nuisance, and affects a person's health, thereby offending Article 21 of the Constitution if it exceeds a reasonable limit. 2. Noise pollution can be curbed by adopting measures such as using eco-friendly technology, designing machinery to create less sound, planting trees, creating public awareness, and regulating noise through legislation. 3. The prescribed standards regarding noise by the Government of India should be strictly enforced, and separate courts for noise pollution cases should be established. 4. The subject of environmental protection should be made compulsory at school, college, and university levels, and the press and media should play a constructive role in highlighting the disastrous effects of noise pollution.
Final Decision: The writ application was disposed of accordingly, with no costs.
A. P. PASAYAT, C. J.
( 1 ) ALL these cases relate to noise pollution in different parts of the State of Orissa caused due to use of high sounding explosive fire works and other blaring sound producing devices and the effect of the resultant pollution in sound. The petitions have been filed in the form of public interest litigation. It is highlighted that the manner in which the sound pollution is being caused and the impact of such sound pollution is on the health of the people, is a cause for great concern. The prayer essentially in each of the writ petitions is for direction to the concerned authorities to prevent the sound pollution, and consequential health hazards.
( 2 ) "pollution" is noun derived from the transitive verb "pollute," which according to the Random House Dictionary of the English Language (College Edition, 1977) means :" (1) to make foul or unclean, dirty : to pollute the air with smoke. (2) to make impure or morally unclean, defile, desecrate to soil, defile. Synonyms 1. Soil, befoul, 2. Taint, examinable, corrupt, debase. "according to Halsbury's Laws of England, Fourth Edition, Vol. 38, 'pollution' means the direct or indirect discharge by man of substances or energy into the aquatic environment resulting in hazard to human health, harm to living resources and aquatic ecosystems, damage to amenities or interference with other legitimate uses of water. "the above definition relates to pollution of water, and has not covered pollution in general. As regards noise pollution it simply connotes unwanted sound in the atmosphere. It is unwanted because it lacks the agreeable amicable quality. Noise is, therefore, sound, but it is pollution when the effects of sound become undesirable. The encyclopedia Britannica has stated :-"in acoustics noise is defined as any undesired sound. According to this definition, a sound of church bells may be music to others. Usually, noise is a mixture of many tones combined in a non-musical manner. "the Encyclopedia Americana further states :-"noise by definition is unwanted sound. What is pleasant to some ears may be extremely unpleasant to other, depending on a number of psychological factors. The sweetest music, if it disturbs a person who is trying to concentrate or to sleep, is noise to him, just as the sound of a pneumatic riveting hammer is noise to nearly everyone. In other words, any sound may be noise if circumstances cause it to be disturbing. "the pollution as evil, thus brings the society to understand that mankind is part of nature. Richard Maybe, in his "handbook on Pollution" observes that the 'root cause of pollution probably lies in the sort of world we have chosen to build for ourselves, and in our thoughtless worship of progress at any cost. This amply illustrates that pollution is plain progress crisis.
( 3 ) IT is seen that the various environmental laws have failed to afford sufficient remedial measures for the individual sufferers, and the criminal liability created thereunder is mostly generalised and is of little avail to the person or persons who become victims of any pollutant. Another vital aspect lacking in the environmental laws is that there is no independent law on noise pollution.
( 4 ) IT is submitted on behalf of the State Pollution Control Board (in short the 'board') that the State of Orissa has legislated an enactment namely. The Orissa Fire Works and Loudspeaker (Regulation) Act, 1958 (in short 'loudspeaker Act') as amended in 1993. This Act has been enacted for the purpose of regulating display of explosive fire works and use of loudspeaker from the date of the enactment. The Act has been made applicable to the Municipalities and the Notified Areas under the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (in short 'municipal Act' ). Section 3 of the said Act prescribes the restricted zones and time period for use of loudspeaker and display of explosive fire works within the permissible time and also provides that permission for the same has to be obtained
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.