SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ori) 229

P.K.MISRA
BALARAM DASH – Appellant
Versus
GITANJALI DASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.DAS, D.P.SARANGI, M.K.PANDA, Pramod Ch.Sejpada, R.C.RATH, S.K.ACHARYA, S.S.MOHANTY

P. K. MISRA, J.


( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Sarangi for the petitioner and Mr. Rath for opposite parties 1 and 2. The husband has filed this petition against the order of the Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, granting interim maintenance of Rs. 200/- per month to the wife and the minor daughter. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in an earlier petition for restitution of conjugal right under S. 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a decree for restitution of conjugal right has been passed against the wife and without complying with the said decree, the wife has filed one petition under S. 125, Code of Criminal Procedure, claiming maintenance. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that a petition for stay has been filed for staying the proceeding under S. 125, Criminal Procedure Code, till disposal of Title Appeal No. 74 of 1996 which is now pending before the District Judge, Puri.

( 2 ) THE order of interim maintenance is in favour of the wife as well as the minor daughter. There is no dispute that during the pendency of a proceeding under S. 125, Code of Criminal Procedure, a direction for interim maintenance can be passed if the Court is prima facie satisfied t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top