SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ori) 275

P.K.TRIPATHY
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (CIVIL), CUTTACK – Appellant
Versus
BANAMALI PARIDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.Patnaik, H.H.KAR, Nibedita Kanungo, P.K.PATNAIK

P. K. TRIPATHY, J.

( 1 ) AC. 1. 08 decimals of Sarada Dofasali land apertaining to Plot Nos. 414 and 416 under holding No. 71 in village chhanda under Patkura police-stattion was acquired by the Government for drainage purpose as per the declaration dated 26. 7. 1983. The Land Acquisition Officer i. e. , the appellant assessed the compensation @rs. 15,000/- per acre and along with other statutory entitlements determined the total compensation at Rs. 18,630/ -. The claimant-respondent received the same on protest and claimed for higher compensation. Hence reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'the Act;) was made by the appellant to the court of subordinate Judge, Kendrapara which was registered as L. A. Misc. Case No. 19 of 1984.

( 2 ) DURING the course of inquiry, respondent examined three witnesses including himself as P. W. 1 and relied upon two registered sale deeds vide Exts. 1 and 2. The appellant examined an Amin as the solitary witness from its side and relied upon the sale statistics Ext. A and the grounds for valuation Ext. B. On assessment of such evidence, learned subordinate Judge held that there is positive evidence from the side of t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top