P.K.MISRA
SATYABHAMA MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD. – Respondent
P. K. MISRA, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ application has prayed for issuance of a direction to opposite parties 1 to 4 to supply electric connection to the residential house of the petitioner. It is also prayed that opposite parties 5 and 6 may be directed to afford necessary police help for the purpose of facilitating the work of opposite parties 1 to 4 at the spot.
( 2 ) THE petitioner wants to take electric supply connection to her house for which application has been made. It appears that even though opposite parties 1 to 4 were inclined to provide electric connection, due to the resistance by opposite party no. 7, no such connection could be given. The petitioner has filed annexure-4, the Sketchmap, showing the location of the house and the pole from which the connection is to be obtained. The petitioner has also relied upon the order dated 22. 2. 1993 under Section 147, Code of Criminal Procedure, in criminal Misc. case No. 541/91, wherein the Executive Magistrate has declared that the present petitioner has right to use the disputed land described in the said order as a passage. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of such order, w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.