P.K.TRIPATHY
JHUMPA PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
TANU GOUDA – Respondent
P. K. TRIPATHY, J.
( 1 ) :- Learned counsel for the petitioners files certified copy of the orders in E. P. No. 6 of 1996 and the correspondences made in that proceeding besides the reports of the process-server. It be kept on record.
( 2 )
( 3 ) THIS application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. , is disposed of at the stage of admission after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners inasmuch as the opposite party/complainant after receipt of the notice has not entered appearance.
( 4 ) PETITIONERS are the accused persons in ICC No. 59 of 1998 in the Court of the J. M. F. C. , Aska. Opposite party instituted the aforesaid complaint alleging the offences under Sections 448/380/395/354/294/325/427/506/34, IPC, with the allegations that on 11-8-1998 accused persons demolished her dwelling house and removed the household articles by use of force. On perusal of the statement in support thereof learned S. D. J. M. found existence of a prima facie case and on 1-11-2000 took cognizance of the offences under Sections 427/506/34, IPC after conducting enquiry under Section 202, Cr. P. C.
( 5 ) LEARNEDCOUNSEL for the petitioners states that petitioner No. 4 (accused No. 5) was then working
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.