SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ori) 391

P.K.TRIPATHY
JHUMPA PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
TANU GOUDA – Respondent


P. K. TRIPATHY, J.

( 1 ) :- Learned counsel for the petitioners files certified copy of the orders in E. P. No. 6 of 1996 and the correspondences made in that proceeding besides the reports of the process-server. It be kept on record.

( 2 )

( 3 ) THIS application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. , is disposed of at the stage of admission after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners inasmuch as the opposite party/complainant after receipt of the notice has not entered appearance.

( 4 ) PETITIONERS are the accused persons in ICC No. 59 of 1998 in the Court of the J. M. F. C. , Aska. Opposite party instituted the aforesaid complaint alleging the offences under Sections 448/380/395/354/294/325/427/506/34, IPC, with the allegations that on 11-8-1998 accused persons demolished her dwelling house and removed the household articles by use of force. On perusal of the statement in support thereof learned S. D. J. M. found existence of a prima facie case and on 1-11-2000 took cognizance of the offences under Sections 427/506/34, IPC after conducting enquiry under Section 202, Cr. P. C.

( 5 ) LEARNEDCOUNSEL for the petitioners states that petitioner No. 4 (accused No. 5) was then working

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top