SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 254

B.P.DAS
DILLIP KUMAR PATRA – Appellant
Versus
JAYANTA KUMAR MOHANTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.MISHRA, S.K.MISHRA

B. P. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Sec. 482, Cr. P. C. is directed against an order dated 30/6/2000 passed by the learned J. M. F. C. (R), Cuttack in I. C. C. No. 24 of 1999 with a prayer to recall the order of taking cognizance in the said complaint case.

( 2 ) THE fact giving rise to this revision application as narrated tends to reveal that the opposite party instituted a complaint case which was registered as I. C. C. No. 10 of 1998 against the present petitioners for the offence under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and in the said case cognizance of the aforesaid offence was taken by the order of the learned Magistrate dated 20/2/1998. But the same was dismissed on 17/4/1999 under Sec. 204 (4), Cr. P. C. as the complainant was absent and failed to file fresh requisites. Thereafter another complaint was filed on 7/5/1999 on the self-same allegation and basing upon the same dishonoured cheque, which was registered as I. C. C. No. 24 of 1999 and cognizance was taken under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As it appears from the narration made in the complaint petition that the present petitioners issued a cheque on 6/9/1997 for an amount of Rs. 77,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top