SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 384

P.K.MISRA, B.PANIGRAHI
PANCHU PANCHANAN MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Banbihari Nayak, D.P.Dhal, S.K.Nayak, S.PRADHAN

B. PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of conviction and sentence passed under Section 302, IPC by the learned 2nd Addi. Sessions Judge, Pun in Sessions Trial No. 31/165 of 1989 directing the appellant to undergo imprisonment for life.

( 2 ) THE short story of the prosecution as unfolded in course of trial is as follows P. W. 8, Hatakishore Lenka of village Kathuaredi lodged a report at Brahmagiri Police Station by stating that on 4/8/1988 around 6. 00 P. M. while he was returning from his paddy field situated near Luniary jungle he noticed that some crows were chirping inside the jungle. Out of curiosity he alongwith one Rabi Baral of village Hatia went to the jungle and found an old Khurda napkin (M. O. VII) lying at the entrance of the jungle. They also marked streak of blood in the nearby area. After they advanced a little distance, they found a young man aged about 25 years lying dead beneath a mango tree with pool of blood. Such incident, however, aroused their suspicion that some miscreants must have committed an offence of murder. They returned to their village and disclosed the fact to the other villagers. They further brought to the notice of a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top