SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ori) 612

A.S.NAIDU
RAJAT KUMAR DAS ALIAS DIPU DAS – Appellant
Versus
REPUBLIC OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.Nayak, P.C.DAS, P.K.Panda, R.ROY, S.K.MISHRA, S.K.PADHI, S.N.MOHAPATRA

A. S. NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) RELYING upon Section 6 of the commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, a petition was filed before the learned Sessions judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar in S. T. No. 161 of 1999 and S. T. No. 53 of 2000 by the accused persons under Section 340, Cr. P. C. praying for drawing up prosecution against p. Ws. 3, 15, 36 and 39 for having deliberately given false evidence in the Sessions trials. The said petition having been rejected by order dated 15-2-2003, the present criminal Misc. case is filed.

( 2 ) THE accused-petitioners are facing trial under Section 302, I. P. C. read with other sections for committing murder of Graham stains and others. The Central Government by Notification had appointed Justice D. P. Wadhwa under the Commissions of Inquiry act to inquire and report. The report was submitted and was placed before the Union cabinet and was approved. According to the petitioners who are accused in the abovementioned Sessions cases, the aforesaid P. Ws. were also examined in the wadhwa Commission and the statements made by them in Court are contradictory to the statements made before the Commission and according to Mr. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioners, i







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top