L.MOHAPATRA
NARENDRA MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
MANORAMA MOHAPATRA – Respondent
L. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 2 3/03/2000 passed by learned Judge, Family court, Rourkela in Criminal Proceeding no. 53 of 1999 allowing maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month to the opposite party in a proceeding under Section 125, Cr. P. C.
( 2 ) THE case of the opposite party is that she had married the petitioner in the year 1961 and out of the wedlock three daughters and one son were born. After the marriage the opposite party was residing in her matrimonial house at Rajkanika and the petitioner was residing at Rourkela and was serving as a senior teacher in Rourkela Steel plant. At that point of time the petitioner developed relationship with one of his students, namely, Basanti Sahoo and started neglecting the opposite party and children. Coming to know about such relationship the opposite party lost her mental balance and taking advantage of such condition, the petitioner in collusion with said Basanti Sahoo took her to Uditnagar Court premises and obtained her signature on a petition meant for divorce on her consent and ultimately also obtained a decree for divorce by fraud. Thereafter, it is alleged that the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.