SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ori) 61

L.MOHAPATRA
NARENDRA MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
MANORAMA MOHAPATRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Nanda, D.K.BISWAS, S.BISVAL

L. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 2 3/03/2000 passed by learned Judge, Family court, Rourkela in Criminal Proceeding no. 53 of 1999 allowing maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month to the opposite party in a proceeding under Section 125, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE case of the opposite party is that she had married the petitioner in the year 1961 and out of the wedlock three daughters and one son were born. After the marriage the opposite party was residing in her matrimonial house at Rajkanika and the petitioner was residing at Rourkela and was serving as a senior teacher in Rourkela Steel plant. At that point of time the petitioner developed relationship with one of his students, namely, Basanti Sahoo and started neglecting the opposite party and children. Coming to know about such relationship the opposite party lost her mental balance and taking advantage of such condition, the petitioner in collusion with said Basanti Sahoo took her to Uditnagar Court premises and obtained her signature on a petition meant for divorce on her consent and ultimately also obtained a decree for divorce by fraud. Thereafter, it is alleged that the petitioner






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top