SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ori) 78

P.K.TRIPATHY
DAMBARUDHAR MOHANTA – Appellant
Versus
MANGULU CHARAN NAIK – Respondent


P. K. TRIPATHY, J.

( 1 )

( 2 ) THIS writ petition stands disposed of at the stage of admission after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and finding no illegality in the impugned order passed by the District Judge, Keonjhar in civil Revision No. 14 of 1994.

( 3 ) PETITIONER is the judgment-debtor and the opposite party No. 1 is the decree-holders in Execution Case No. 23 of 1983 of the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), keonjhar. That Execution Case was dismissed for default on 25-6-1993 because of not taking requisite step by the decree- holder. On 3-2-1994 application for restoration vide M. J. C. No. 69 of 1993 filed by the petitioner was rejected by learned Civil judge on the ground that the provision in section 151, C. P. C. is not applicable for restoration and that the provision under Order 21, Rule 106, CPC is applicable but the petition being barred by time the prayer for restoration cannot be allowed.

( 4 ) OPPOSITE Party No. 1 preferred Civil revision No. 14 of 1994 against the aforesaid order passed by the Civil Judge. After hearing the parties, learned District Judge recorded the findings that learned Civil judge misconceived about the legal provision re


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top