SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ori) 678

P.K.TRIPATHY
NARENDRA MEHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Mohapatra, J.R.DAS, N.C.PATIL, O.K.MOHAPATRA, S.K.Balain

P. K. TRIPATHY, J.

( 1 ) ORDER of conviction under Section 307, IPC against the petitioner pronounced by learned Asst. Sessions Judge, Dharmagarh in Sessions case Nos, 25/3 of 1991 and confirmed by learned Sessions Judge, Kalahandi at bhawanipatna in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1991 is under challenge.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the case of the prosecution, while the injured (P. W. No. 9)was carrying on his business in the weekly market at Dharamgarh, at about 1. 30 p. m. , accused attacked him from behind and dealt kati blow as a result of which P. W. No. 9 sustained bleeding fracture injury on back side of the head and also over the angle of left mandible. Petitioner was caught red handed at the spot, injured was taken to the hospital, police was informed and the law was set into motion. After completion of routine investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused. Learned Asst. Sessions Judge framed charge for the offence under Section 307, IPC. Accused denied to the charge and claimed for trial. In course of trial as many as 11 witnesses were examined and series of documents were proved besides placing on record the blood stained wearing apparels as M. Os. I to IV and the weapo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top