SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ori) 281

A.K.PARICHHA
KHALIL NAHAK – Appellant
Versus
HADU NAHAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.RATH, Goutam Mishra, P.K.MISHRA, S.K.PADHI

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, aska passed in T. A. No. 19 of 1982 confirming the judgment and decree of the learned munsif, Aska in T. S. No. 15 of 1980 dismissing the suit of the plaintiff appellant against the defendant-respondent.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT's case was that he purchased the suit land measuring 6 cubits north to south, 30 cubits east to west standing on Survey No. 115/11 in patta No. 35 of village Nuagam on 8-9-1976 from one sahadev Nayak, who had purchased that land from one Bhobani Nayak on 18-5-1965 in the name of his wife Late Kishori Deby by way of benami transaction. The defendant-respondent whose house adjoins the suit site encroached into the suit land measuring an extent of 4 x 30 cubits in spite of protest of the plaintiff appellant. The plaintiff accordingly filed the suit for a direction to the defendant-respondent to vacate the suit land, to restore the suit site to its original condition at his own cost and also not to enter upon or otherwise interfering in any way with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit land. Defendant-respondent in his written statement took the stand that the s























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top