SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ori) 298

PRADIP MOHANTY
RAGHUNATH PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Acharya, D.P.Dhal, K.RATH, P.K.Rautray, PRATAP ROY, S.K.TRIPATHI

( 1 ) THIS revision arises out of the judgment and order dated 19-2-2001 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, nayagarh, in Criminal Appeal No. 26/51/37 of 1997/1992/1991, confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the J. M. F. C. , Ranpur in G. R. Case No. 113 of 1987.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution in brief is that on 10-10-1987 at about 7. 00 a. m. , while the victim Bali Dei, an old lady, was proceeding on the left side of the road towards the temple of Lord Siva, a bus bearing registration number ORC 1155, which was coming from Godipada side in a reckless manner being driven by the accused-petitioner, dashed against her. As a result, she fell down and the bus ran over her causing her instantaneous death. Thereafter, an FIR was lodged before the Ranpur P. S. , on receipt of which investigation commenced and after closure of investigation charge-sheet was submitted under Sections 279/304-A, ipc. But the learned J. M. F. C. , on perusal of police papers, took cognizance under Section 118-A of the Motor Vehicles Act besides the aforesaid two sections of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) IN order to prove its case, the prosecution examined as many as 12 witn








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top