SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ori) 609

R.N.BISWAL
UPENDRA KUMAR MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
BIDHUMUKHI PANDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MOHAKUDA, B.P.PANDA, BASUDEV MISHRA, G.N.DAS, H.B.DEBATA, L.N.MISHRA

( 1 ) THIS is a Second Appeal by one of the defendants, namely Upendra kumar Mahapatra from the concurrent decision dated 30-4-1986 of the sub-Judge, bargarh, passed in Title Appeal No. 18 of 1983 by which the suit is decreed.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF Nos. 1 and 2 are wife and husband. As per the plaint averment late gouri Shankar Mahapatra, father of the defendants, in the capacity of Karta of the hindu undivided Joint family sold A. 1. 22 decimals of land as fully described in schedule 'a' of the plaint to plaintiff No. 1 by a registered sale deed dated 22-6-1964 (Ext. 5)wherein defendant No. 3 is an attesting witness, to meet the pressing family necessity, delivered possession of it to her and since then the plaintiffs have been possessing the same. Before the sale defendant Nos. 3 and 4 who had already attained majority by then, executed an Ekrarnama (Ext. 4) authorizing their father, Gouri Shankar Mahapatra to alienate a portion of the joint family property. On 24/25-7-1980 the defendants threatened to dispossess the plaintiffs from the disputed land, for which they filed Title suit No. 76 of 1980 in the Court of Munsif, bargarh praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top