SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ori) 623

A.K.PARICHHA
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
MADHUSUDAN SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Mishra, B.N.RATH, MANOJ MISHRA, S.K.Senapati

( 1 ) THIS is on appeal by the state against the order of acquittal of the respondents recorded by the learned Assistant sessions Judge, Chhatrapur in Sessions Case No. 31 of 1985.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the prosecution case is that the injured P. W. 6 and the respondent-accused persons were inimical to each other and number of litigations were going on between them. The accused persons had also threatened P. W. 6 and his family members with dire consequences. In such background, on 23-4-1983 at about 3. 00 p. m. while P. W. 6 was coming with P. W. 5 on a bicycle from village Hatiota to Polasara, the accused persons armed with deadly weapons obstructed them at a place called 'kolamabadalanala' and while the accused persons namely, Banshi, Kirtana, Kati Sahu and Rarnesh obstructed P. Ws. 5 and 6, accused madhusudan Sahu and Kalu Charan sahu dealt Kati (sword) blows on the left leg of P. W. 6, as a result of which his leg was severed from the body. It is also alleged that accused Debendra Panigrahi removed a cash of Rs. 1250/- from the pocket of P. W. 6. Seeing this murderous attack on P. W, 6, p. W. 5 fled away from the spot leaving his cycle and informed P. W. 4, who happens to be












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top