SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 64

A.S.NAIDU
PURNA CHANDRA MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
RENUKA JENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.ROUTRAY

( 1 ) THE point of law that is raised in this case is as to whether a co-sharer of a joint family property after alienating a portion thereof in favour of a stranger to the joint family can opt for re-purchase along with the other co-sharers in consonance with section 4 read with sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Partition Act.

( 2 ) TO answer the said question, it would be necessary to discuss the factual matrix in brief. One Balu Malik was the original owner of the land appertaining to plot No. 87 under khata No. 234 situate in Mouza bidyadharpur of Cuttack district and the residential house of the family exists on a portion of the said land. Balu died in the year 1940 leaving behind him two sons, namely, Purna Chandra Mallik (present petitioner), Bhagirathi Mallik and a grandson namely Nrusingha Mallik (son of his predeceased son Gangadhar ). Bhagirathi and Nrusingha having joined hands sold a portion of the aforesaid joint family dwelling house to one Smt. Renuka jena (present opposite party No. 1 ). Since renuka could not take possession of the portion of the said dwelling house, she filed title Suit No. 658 of 1988 in the Court of thee Civil Judge (SD ). 1st Court, Cuttack

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top