SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 56

M.QUDDUSI, A.K.PARICHHA
SUSANTA KUMAR PATRA – Appellant
Versus
R. T. O. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M.Sarangi, P.PANDA

M. QUDDUSI, J.

( 1 ) THESE are nine writ petitions filed against the seizure of the vehicles of the petitioners under Section 207 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by the Regional transport Officers raising the grievance that their vehicles bearing registration numbers mentioned against the number of each of the writ petitions noted below have been seized and detained for alleged contravention of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules. . W. P. (C) No. Vehicle No. 1. 262 of 2007 OR-02-Y-0604 2. 263 of 2007 OR-19-B-1699 3. 264 of 2007 OR-05-E-4591 4. 265 of 2007 OR-05-N-8777 5. 266 of 2007 OR-05-T-2099 6. 267 of 2007 OR-05-E-0291 7. 291 of 2007 OR-02-C-2588 8. 292 of 2007 OR-25-9667 9. 293 of 2007 OR-02-L-5567

 

( 2 ) SOME of the learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the Regional transport Officers have not proceeded further after seizure of the vehicles but some of the learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the Regional Transport officers have offered for compounding of the offences, but the petitioners did not agree with the same and thereafter no further action












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top