High Court Of Orissa
M. QUDDUSI AND A. K. PARICHHA, JJ.
SUSANTA KUMAR PATRA - Appellant
Versus
R.T.O. - Respondent
W. P. 262 Of 2007
Decided On : 01/18/2007
Motor Vehicles Act - Seizure of Vehicles - Section 207(1), Section 55, Section 86, Section 200 - Summary
Fact of the Case:
Nine writ petitions filed against the seizure of vehicles under Section 207(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by Regional Transport Officers. Dispute over compounding of offenses and cancellation of permits and registrations.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the officers to offer composition of offenses to the vehicle owners and release the vehicles if the owners deposit 50% of the amount offered for composition of the offense.
Issues: Seizure of vehicles, compounding of offenses, cancellation of permits and registrations, authority to take action under Sections 55 and 86 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The power of seizure and detention under Section 207(1) is limited to specific contraventions. Cancellation of registration or permit can only be done based on grounds mentioned in Sections 55 and 86. Compounding of offenses under Section 200 is distinct from cancellation of registration or permit.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petitions with directions for offering composition of offenses and releasing vehicles upon deposit of 50% of the amount offered.
M. QUDDUSI, J.
( 1 ) THESE are nine writ petitions filed against the seizure of the vehicles of the petitioners under Section 207 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by the Regional transport Officers raising the grievance that their vehicles bearing registration numbers mentioned against the number of each of the writ petitions noted below have been seized and detained for alleged contravention of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules. . W. P. (C) No. Vehicle No. 1. 262 of 2007 OR-02-Y-0604 2. 263 of 2007 OR-19-B-1699 3. 264 of 2007 OR-05-E-4591 4. 265 of 2007 OR-05-N-8777 5. 266 of 2007 OR-05-T-2099 6. 267 of 2007 OR-05-E-0291 7. 291 of 2007 OR-02-C-2588 8. 292 of 2007 OR-25-9667 9. 293 of 2007 OR-02-L-5567
( 2 ) SOME of the learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the Regional transport Officers have not proceeded further after seizure of the vehicles but some of the learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the Regional Transport officers have offered for compounding of the offences, but the petitioners did not agree with the same and thereafter no further action was taken by them.
( 3 ) MR. P. Panda, learned counsel for the transport Department has submitted that after seizure of the vehicles or documents, as the case may be, under Section 207 (1) of the Act if the RTOs offer compounding of the offences in accordance with law and the owners of the vehicles do not agree to the same, it is within the jurisdiction of the RTOs to cancel the permits and the registration of the vehicles under Sections 55 and 86 of the Act.
( 4 ) SECTION 207 (1) of the Act authorizes a police officer or any other person authorized by the State Government to seize and detain a vehicle or document connected to the vehicles. In the instant writ petitions, the regional Transport Officers who are duly authorized by the State Government have seized the vehicles. Therefore, it cannot be said that the seizure and detention of the vehicles by them are without jurisdiction. However, the power of seizure and detention under sub-section (1) of Section 207 of the Act is limited to the contravention of the provisions of Section 3,. e. , valid driving licence, section 4,. e. , driving a motor vehicle beyond the age limit of the person fixed by the Government, Section 39,. e. . without having any registration and sub-section (1) of Section 66,. e. without permit or in contravention of any condition of the permit. Section 200 of the Act permits the composition of offences committed under Sections 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, sub-sections (1) and (2) of Sections 183, 184, 186, 189, sub-section (2) of Sections 190, 191, 192, 194. 196 or Section 198 of the Act.
( 5 ) THE grounds on the basis of which the registration of a motor vehicle or a permit granted to it, could be cancelled have been given under Sections 55 and 86 of the act, according to which if a vehicle has been destroyed or has been rendered permanently incapable of use or removed permanently out of India or the registration has been obtained on the basis of fake documents or the engine number or chassis number embossed on the vehicle are different from the numbers entered in the certificate of registration, the registration can be cancelled under Section 55 of the Act. Therefore, the registration of a motor vehicle cannot be cancelled in any other situation. In the similar manner if the grounds mentioned in Section 86 exist only then the permit granted to a motor vehicle can be cancelled or suspended. Some of them are breach of conditions mentioned in Section 84 of the Act,. e. , absence of valid certificate of fitness or unauthorised use of vehicles etc. Therefore, the authority having jurisdiction to cancel the registration or a permit, cannot act on any ground other than the grounds mentioned in Sections 55 and 86 of the Act.
( 6 ) THEREFORE, proceedings regarding cancellation of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.