SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 666

M.M.DAS
SUDHIR KUMAR BRAHMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.DAS, B.DAS, B.P.Tripathi, J.K.TRIPATHY, J.Mohanty, P.K.CHAND

M. M. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THOUGH this is an application under Section 439 Cr. P. C. filed by the petitioner for grant of bail, the facts on which the case evolved not only has created sensation throughout the State as well as the country, but also involves interesting and important question to be dealt with.

( 2 ) A few weeks ago, large numbers of aborted foetus were found from various places in the district of Nayagarh. This gave rise to a suspicion in the mind of the general public that probably after sex determination, finding the sex of the foetus to be female, the mothers have chosen for aborting the child.

( 3 ) IT is well known that even after 60 years of independence, in our country, boys and girls are still not given equal preference. Poor families in the society or for that matter, the conservative and old fashioned parents prefer boys and girls are seen as a burden and inferior to boys. This is more fortified due to the social stigma of dowry. On account of the above, in spite of enactments made by the Legislature prohibiting sex determination before birth of the child, the medical practitioners by modern scientific methods, some times disclose the sex of the foetus to the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top