SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 34

P.K.MOHANTY
BASANTI DEI – Appellant
Versus
BIJAYAKRUSHNA PATNAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Misra, R.C.PATNAIK

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by defendant No. 1 is against the confirming judgment of the learned Addl. District Judge, Dhenkanal passed in a suit for declaration of title to and recovery of possession of 0. 55 acre of land appertaining to plot No, 3000 situated within the town area of Dhenkanal.

( 2 ) PLOTS Nos. 2999 and 3000 are adjacent to each other. In the current settlement record-of-rights finally published in December, 1965 plot No. 2999 was recorded in the name of defendant No. 1 and plot No. 3000 in the name of the plaintiffs, vide Exts. D and 2. The plaintiffs' case was that their ancestors had allowed the father of defendant No. 1 to possess a portion of the homestead plot No. 2999 and after his death the defendants have been residing there. During the current settlement operations there was dispute between the parties with regard to plot No. 2999 but it was ultimately recorded in the name of defendant No. 1. When the plaintiffs were contemplating to file a suit against the defendant No. 1 in respect of that plot the defendants forcibly possessed the disputed plot No. 3000 in January, 1966. So the plaintiffs filed the suit for the aforesaid reliefs treating the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top