SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 44

P.K.MOHANTY, R.N.MISRA
JEMMA – Appellant
Versus
RAGHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.A.R.DORA, N.V.RAMDAS

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge in second appeal at the instance of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) ON 14-5-1970, plaintiff filed the suit for declaration that the properties in dispute belonged to her, the order of the Estates Abolition Collector settling the lands with the defendant was void, for permanent injunction against the defendant from entering upon the disputed properties and for recovery of possession of a house on the allegation that the disputed properties constituted village carpenter's service inam and on the death of Jogi (plaintiff's husband) in 1921, his son Gadadhar had succeeded to the property. Gadadhar however, died in 1943 and thereafter plaintiff was in possession of the disputed properties. As the defendant started interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment, she was forced to come to court.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT is the son of Jogi's brother Bhima. According to his case, after Jogi died in 1921, Bhima rendered service and came to possess the property. Bhima died in 1945 and after him, defendant was rendering service and was in possession. In regard to two plots, no claim was rais




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top