SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 71

K.B.PANDA, R.N.MISRA
AFTABUDDIN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
CHANDAN BILASINI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Dutt, R.K.Mahapatra, SK.RAHENOMA

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THERE lived one Kalikrishna Sarkar in the town of Cuttack owning substantial properties. He died immediately after executing a Will on 11-12-1905 (Ext 11)in terms whereof some of his assets were given to his mother add other relatives, some to the family deity Sri Radha Binoda Jew and the rest of the properties were meant to go to his wife Chandan Bilasini (plaintiff No. 1 ). Five executors appointed under the Will were to manage the properties and after meeting the expenses of administration were required to pay the mesne profits to her. The testament absolutely put restriction on alienations by the wife but authorised her to take a son in adoption and in case the first adopted son died, to take another with the approval of the executors. The Will was probated in a proceeding of 1906 and while the executors were in management of the estate of the deceased, plaintiff No. 1 adopted one Sudhansu Mohan Sarkar. The adoptive mother and, the adopted son did not pull on well and their relationship became embittered. Late in 1930's, both the widow and the adopted son started claiming possession of the estate which led to a proceeding before the patna High Court under


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top