SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ori) 16

S.ACHARYA
SURAJMALL SHIWBHAGAWAN – Appellant
Versus
KALINGA IRON WORKS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.Sinha, P.MOHANTY, P.ROY, S.MOHANTY

S. ACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant has preferred this revision against the order passed by the subordinate Judge, Keonjhar on 21-1-78 in Money Suit No. 1 of 1975.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is a unit of the Industrial Development Corporation of Orissa, ltd. The defendant-firm carries on business in Calcutta. The plaintiff's suit, in short, is for realisation of certain amount of money claimed on the basis of the balance dues on the defendant on account of supply of goods by the plaintiff to the defendant and on account of loss sustained by the plaintiff due to payment of demurrage and other amounts due to the default of the defendants as specified in the plaint. The defendant while denying the plaintiff's claim has alleged that the court at Keonjhar has no territorial jurisdiction to try this suit as no part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court and the plaintiff had entered into an agreement with the defendant to the effect that ell disputes between the parties arising out of the said contract would be settled in Calcutta or by the courts in Calcutta.

( 3 ) AFTER the filing of the written statement and framing of the issues in the suit, on the petition of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top