SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ori) 65

R.N.MISRA, N.K.DAS
MALLI BEWA – Appellant
Versus
NATABAR NAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.RAUTRAY, M.Patra, N.MUKHARJI

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 1 and 2 have challenged the decision of the learned District judge of Cuttack granting Letters of Administration with a copy of the Will annexed in favour of the plaintiff. During the pendency of the appeal, defendant no. 1 appellant died and her name has been deleted without any substitution by order No. 14 dated 28-11-1974. The sole plaintiff-respondent having died, his legal representatives have been brought on record as respondents.

( 2 ) ONE Panu Khuntia had two sons Damei and Nidhi. Damei's grandson is madhusudan (defendant No. 2 ). Nidhi had a daughter Malli (defendant No. 1)and two sons Radhashyam and Balakrishna. Radhashyam's widow Kamala was the testatrix. Balakrishna pre-deceased Radhashyam leaving behind a daughter shakuntala. Radhashyam died in 1964 while living separate from his brother. Malli had married away. Kamala was in her late thirties when she became a widow. Birakishore (P. W. 1) and Natabar (plaintiff) are first cousins. The testatrix got involved in certain litigations and the two cousins looked after the same. Natabar became a God-brother of Kamala and started looking after the properties of Kamala. Natabar applied for Le





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top