SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ori) 66

P.K.MOHANTY
DOKI ADINARAYANA SUBUDHI AND BROTHERS – Appellant
Versus
DOKI SURYA PRAKASH RAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Asok Das, C.A.RAO, R.MOHANTY, S.N.SATPATHY

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant as plaintiff brought Original Suit No. 2 of 1978 for a declaration that the defendant-respondent has no right to use the plaintiffs trade mark in respect of the Masala (chewing tobacco) branded as "bharat Vikhyat Khetaki khara Masala No. 666" of which the plaintiff claimed to be the registered owner under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act and the Copyright Act. The plaintiff also filed an application for issue of a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from infringing his right to the trade mark. After hearing the parties, the learned District Judge rejected the prayer for temporary injunction by order dated 4-10-78 on the finding that even though the plaintiff had prima facie title and exclusive right to the use of the trade mark, he having suppressed the material fact of a settlement deed dated 12-11-63 and the fact of association of the defendant in the business was not entitled to the grant of a temporary injunction.

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by the order, the plaintiff preferred this Misc. Appeal which came up for admission and hearing on 1-11-78. In course of hearing of the appeal, mr. R. Mohanty, the learned counsel for the appellant













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top