P.K.MOHANTY
RAGHUNATH TRIPATHY – Appellant
Versus
DIBAKAR TRIPATHY – Respondent
P. K. MOHANTI, J.
( 1 ) THIS civil revision has been preferred by defendant No. 1 against an order rejecting his application under Order 41, Rule 27, C. P. C.
( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 1 as plaintiff brought Title Suit No. 59 of 1971 in the court of the Munsif, Kendrapara for a declaration of his right of way over plot no. 56 for going into and coming out of his homestead plot No. 44, for a permanent injunction restraining defendants 1 and 2 from obstructing the plaintiff's right of way and for a mandatory injunction commanding defendant no. 1 to demolish the constructions raised by him on a portion of the suit land.
( 3 ) THE stand taken by the petitioner was that he along with his co-sharers had taken lease of 0. 03 acre of land out of the suit plot from the ex-landlord in the name of defendant No. 2 Daitari Tripathy who was then karta o'f the family. After family partition in the year 1948 the said 0. 03 acre of land fell to the share of defendant No. 2 Daitari Tripathy and one Sara Dibya. Subsequently one Suma Dei, the daughter of Sara Dibya sold the share of her mother to defendant No. 6 Padmalav Tripathy who is the son o'f defendant No. 2. It was alleged that though the sai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.