SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Ori) 63

R.N.MISRA, N.K.DAS
NIRANJAN RAY – Appellant
Versus
JOGENDRA BEHERA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MOHANTY, B.Pal, N.Prusty, P.KAR

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution is to the order of the Consolidation Officer and the appellate and the revisional orders of the Deputy Director, Consolidation and the Consolidation Commissioner respectively.

( 2 ) PETITIONER was admittedly the recorded Sthitiban tenant of 54 decimals of land covered by plots Nos. 21 and 22 under Hal Khata No. 42 of village Dubulia in Basta area of Balasore district under Deity Dadhibaman Jew recorded with madhvasatwadhikari status. According to the petitioner when the estate vested, rent-roll was given in the name of the petitioner and rent was received from the petitioner by the Revenue Officers until 1978. The tenure holders did not apply under Chapter-II of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act being aware of the position that petitioner was in possession of the property with occupancy right. As the lands were located at a distance petitioner had entrusted cultivation thereof to opposite parties 1 to 10 who are god-relations on condition that the expenses would be met by him, a part of the produce would be appropriated by the cultivating opposite parties 1 to 10 and the remainder would be pa


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top