P.K.MOHANTY
GADACHANDI THAKURANI – Appellant
Versus
UDI BARIK – Respondent
P. K. MOHANTI, J.
( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision is directed against ah order rejecting the plaintiffs' prayer for substitution in place of a deceased defendant and for setting aside abatement of the suit.
( 2 ) IN Title Suit No. 317/78 on the file of the learned Munsif of Puri, the advocate for defendant No. 1 filed a memo on 3-12-1980 intimating the Court that his client had died on 1-9-1980. The case was posted to 30-1-1981 for hearing on the memo. On 30-1-1981 the plaintiffs filed an application for substitution of the legal representative of the deceased defendant No. 1. By a separate application supported by affidavit, they also prayed for setting aside abatement of the suit. It was alleged, in the application for setting aside abatement that the plaintiffs came to know about the death of defendant No. 1 on 1-9-1980. By a subsequent affidavit dated 3-2-1981 the plaintiffs stated that they came to know about the death of defendant No. 1 on 3-12-1980 when a memo to that effect was filed by the Advocate for defendant No. 1, but by mistake the date of their knowledge about the death was mentioned as 1-91980 in their earlier application dated 30-1-1981. The learned Munsif rejected th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.