SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 71

R.N.MISRA
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING DIVISION, PURI – Appellant
Versus
CONSTRUCTION INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.JENA

R. N. MISRA, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') against the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhubaneswar, to make the award a rule of the Court.

( 2 ) THE award was received by the Court on 21st Mar. , 1980. Notice was directed oa 27th Mar. , 1980. From the endorsement in the Remarks Column against order No. 2, it appears that the Government Pleader was given notice in the matter that day. On 21st April, 1980, an application was made by the State for time to file objection and time was extended till 6th May, 1980. On 3rd May, 1980, the objection had been filed. The Subordinate Judge proceeded on the footing that for filing of an objection under Section 30 of the Act the period of limitation was 30 days and since the objection filed on 3rd May, 1980 was beyond the 30 day period from the date when notice was given, the said objection was not maintainable.

( 3 ) THE learned Additional Government Advocate in appeal contended that under the new Limitation Act, 1963, the Court has jurisdiction to extend the time for filing of objection, Otherwise put, if there be delay in presentation of an objection being beyond 30


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top