SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 2

P.K.MOHANTY
ANIRUDHA PADHAN – Appellant
Versus
CHHAI PADHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.RATH, N.C.PANIGRAHI, S.C.MOHAPATRA

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THE second appeal is by defendant No. 3 against a decree of affirmance. The suit was for partition on adjudication that the three plaintiffs and defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to one-fifth share each and for delivery of possession of the properties allotted to each.

( 2 ) THE lands in suit originally belonged to one Khadia Padhan who died in 1958 leaving behind him five daughters named Apurba, Chhai, Subhadra, sundarmani and Bhama. Apurba is dead and her son is Ghasia (defendant No. 1 ). Chhai, Sundarmani and Bhama are plaintiffs 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Subhadra is defendant No. 2 and her son is Anirudha (defendant No. 3 ). The plaintiffs' case was that they were in joint possession of the suit lands along with defendant No. 2 till the year 1962 when a dispute arose between the parties as defendant No. 3 falsely claimed himself to be the adopted son of khadia Padhan. A proceeding under Section145, Cr. P. C. was started and it terminated on 4-1-1965, in favour of defendant No. 3. Since then the defendant no. 3 possessed the suit lands after evicting the plaintiffs therefrom. Hence the plaintiffs filed the suit on 26-7-1965 for the aforesaid reliefs.

( 3









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top