SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 45

P.K.MOHANTY
SURESH KUMAR MOHARANA – Appellant
Versus
BRUNDABAN BARIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MOHANTY, R.N.MOHANTY

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three appeals have been heard together and will be disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) ON 20-2-1079 while a truck loaded with boulders was coming from Naulpur towards Chandikhole, it met with an accident on the public road. Four labourers who were travelling by the truck sustained injuries as a result of the accident. They filed four separate claim petitions under Section 110-A of the Motor vehicles Act, 1939, which were registered as Misc. Cases Nos. 41, 42, 43 and 44 of 1979. After the claim petitions were admitted, notices were issued to the owner and the insurer of the vehicle. The owner did not enter contest. The insurance Company filed its written statement and issues were settled. Misc. Case No. 44 of 1979 was posted to 22-3-1980 while the other three Misc. Cases were posted to 5-3-1980 for hearing. On 5-3-1980 the Insurance Company filed a petition for adjournment of Misc. Cases Nos. 41, 42 and 43 of 1979 to 22-31980 for analogous hearing of all the four cases as they arose out of one and the same accident. The Tribunal rejected the prayer and dismissed the claim petitions in Misc. Cases Nos. 41, 42 and 43 of 1979 for default as the cl

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top