SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 92

R.N.MISRA, R.C.PATNAIK
AJOY KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PATA DEI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MOHANTY, G.B.MOHANTY, P.RAY

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE are appeals under the Letters Patent read with the Orissa High Court Order directed against the common appellate decision of B. K. Ray, J. under Section 110-D of the M. V. Act rendered in Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 148 and 181 of 1974.

( 2 ) ON 12-7-1973 at about 3. 30 P. M. one Niranjan Senapati, a Class IV employee in the Establishment of the Gold Controller was knocked down while coming on bicycle on the Link Road within the town of Cuttack by a motor truck bearing registration number ORU 5905, Niranjan succumbed to the injuries while attempts were being made to take him to the hospital. His dependants filed a claim under Section 110-A of the M. V. Act asking for compensation of Rs. 40,000/ -. They im-pleaded the owner of the truck as also the Insurer thereof as respondents. It was pleaded that at the time of death, Niranjan was getting a monthly salary of Rs. 157/ -. He was aged about 30 and his contribution to the family was above Rs. 90/-per month. Niranjan's dependents happen to be the mother, the widow and a son.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1, the owner, filed a Written statement denying that his truck had caused the accident. He also denied all othe

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top