SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ori) 12

P.K.MOHANTY
BALARAM BARIK – Appellant
Versus
BANAMBARA MAHARANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.H.MOHANTY, B.K.Dagara, B.MISHRA, M.Patra

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THE second appeal is by the defendants against a reversing decree passed in a suit for specific peiv formance of contract for sale of land.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's case was that defendant No, 1 Balaram Barik, who was the owner in possession of the suit land measuring 0. 36 acre, contracted to sell the same to him for a sum of Rs. 2,000 and on receipt of a sum of Rs, 1,500 as part consideration delivered possession in his favour. The contract was entered into on 21-1-75 and the deed of contract (Ext. 1) was executed on that date. He remained in possession of the suit land from the date of contract and offered the balance consideration of Rs. 500 to defendant No. 1 but he avoided to execute the sale deed. On 17-3-75, defendant No. 1 sold 0. 08 acre out of the suit land to defendant No. 5 under a registered sale deed (Ext. A) and on 9-475 he also sold 0. 08 acre out of the suit land under a registered sale deed (Ext. B) to defendants 2, 3 and 4. The plaintiff's contention was that the defendants 2 to 5 having prior knowledge of his contract obtained the sale deeds (Extg. A and B) without payment of consideration,

( 3 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 denied the contract and co






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top