SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ori) 36

N.K.DAS, R.C.PATNAIK
P. VENKATESWAR RAO – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE OFFICER AND TAHSILDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.S.Murty

PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS application for a writ of certiorari arises out of a ceiling proceeding under Chapter IV of the Orissa Land Reforms Act. The petitioner and his brothers were treated to belong to one family and certain of their lands were classified as Class I and the ceiling proceeding was concluded accordingly. Appeal and revision having yielded no benefit, the petitioner has taken shelter in this Court.

( 2 ) SO far as the question of separation/ partition is concerned, we have not been convinced about the merits of the petitioner's case. The said finding of the Revenue Authorities is not available to be impeached and is, therefore, sustained. There is, however, much force in the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that the adjudication of the question of classification has been perfunctory.

( 3 ) LOCAL inspection was made by the Revenue Officer and it was found that the petitioner has set up his own water pump run by diesel and water channels were found to have been constructed. From this the Revenue Authorities concluded that lands of the opposite parties were of Class 1 except one plot which was classified as Class IV. Section 2 (5-a) of the Act defines clas




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top